I recall the 'Dreamweaving' days. Learn it on notepad.exe, save it as index.html, upload onto a root server, pray it'll render on Internet Explorer as planned. Not forgetting the fake CSS stylesheet and lines by manually inserting HTML styling syntaxes to each page.

     Today, in the course of troubleshooting Blogspot's theme and page backends, the 'A.I.' compiler proved its efficiency in guiding codes. Well, given that we know the right questions. Else, provided that we learn to ask the right strings of questions. Its process leading to a desirable outcome despite missed attempts are rewarding, if ever compared to the manual research of resource browsing, filtering, and formulating. Yet we should be cautioned that learning via 'conversations' with 'A.I.' engines are better retained, only if questions were treated with curiosity instead of convenience (for which I am often guilty of when patience is compromised).

     If uploading a screenshot of a Webpage layout issue is able to trigger a response that identifies the exact blog theme that I am using, I do hope this tool is used for the greater good of progress. As the saying goes, tools aren't inherently good or evil. In the hand of a user, it is potentially a double-edged sword. This is a long, slow conversation that has fallen behind its own acceleration.